andrew_baker
6.Aug.2004 8.26am
andrew_baker's picture

Can you read this clearly or is it too abstract?

How is the concept working?

Idea's on the ORK?

This is a fun project. There is no client. Just playing around.


Andrew



lorenk
6.Aug.2004 8.34am
lorenk's picture

i can read it, but not too clearly. the H could be a double T...
and the RK is a little hard to read.
overall, i think it looks 'off' because it slants further and further down, till it about falls off my screen. it starts out straight, and then just degrades.


squeeze
6.Aug.2004 9.05am
squeeze's picture

I read, "Pit ttFortz". My confusion is caused by the following:

1 The "c" curling up, rather than down makes it seem like a swashy arm to the "tt".

2 Because of the LC/UC type, the "H" reads as "tt", or because of its positioning it reads as an UC "H" starting another word.

3 The "r-k" reads as "rtz", especially as the positioning relates to the dropping "tt" in Pitch.

I imagine the rightbound degradation of the letters that Loren referred to can be dealt with if there are any graphics to be associated with the type.

PS: Thanks for the assistance on my So Cal Waves logo.


andrew_baker
6.Aug.2004 10.07am
andrew_baker's picture

Thanks for the input!

Loren: Yeah, I guess I'll try aligning the PITCH on one baseline, and the FORK on the other. That H really is in limbo. I'll simplify it too.

Scott: No problem, I hope I have been helpful to you. Your input is certainly helpful. The RTZ I will have to rework. I'll post again soon.

Thanks guys.

Andrew


andrew_baker
6.Aug.2004 12.18pm
andrew_baker's picture

Here is a rework based on your suggestions.

Andrew


hughfire
6.Aug.2004 1.36pm
hughfire's picture

It looks a little like PitchFerk, and Im somewhat distracted by the Capital H . I love the k though.


andrew_baker
6.Aug.2004 1.56pm
andrew_baker's picture

Yer right Hugh. I'm in between stages of development. I'll post a rework later.

Andrew


andrew_baker
6.Aug.2004 1.57pm
andrew_baker's picture

delete