wow, i like it a lot!!

thx.

yes, i guess you are right about numerals, but i am still reluctant to do the treatment. somehow i have the opinion that some characters allow this "negative ink trapping", some not, as in case of most of the numerals...

soon i will upload some regular & bold variants.

This is quite nice! The overall polish is very good, and the display cut is original but understated. However the text cut is of course way too light for [much] text. If you're not going to have darker weights I would suggest changing the naming and targeting the system for intermixed usage - that would allow for some very cool "emphasis" via the [current] display cut in a body of the [current] text, or vice versa! Of course in that case every glyph in the display cut would need some swell.

Looking at the "text" cut:

Both "g"s have problems. The binocular one is quite unhappy; maybe make the bottom bowl larger and more to the right, simplify the join between the two bowls, and try making the ear a simple straight line. The monocular one just needs a less curly terminal I think.

The tittles (dots on "i" and "j") are too big. Although that would work great in the display cut (where I'd make them even bigger).

Numerals: 4 and 8 too narrow.

Spacing: considering this will almost always be used large, the spacing I'd make quite a bit tighter. If you decide to keep this loose spacing, the wordspace needs to be bigger.

hhp

Actually I like the fact that the display cut is only subtly different.
What you might do though is have multiple cuts with increasingly
large swells.

Most fonts have a Weight axis - this could have a Swell axis!

hhp