New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
This week's battle: Design a new logotype for digg. (digg.com)
Let's show our friends over at digg what a logotype could look like when designed by typography experts.
Winner take all, no holds barred. May the best designer win.
// REQUIREMENTS
- Solution must be typographic and contain the letters "digg" in lowercase.
- Letters must be custom drawn. No use of existing fonts!
- Image size: 550 width x 400 height. 72 dpi*
- Color: Black and White
- Format: PNG, GIF or JPG (Preferred in that order. Mmake sure there are no spaces in the name)
*Please try to keep your file sizes to a minimum! 50k per file max.
// ABOUT TYPOPHILE TYPE BATTLES
This is your chance to flex your type muscles on a weekly basis. You have one week to create and submit your entry. Anyone may submit a design response to the challenge. You may enter as often as you wish. Post anytime. Critiques and comments are welcome throughout the game, from participants and spectators alike. Smack talk is encouraged.
As with any street battle, there is no panel of judges and no prize — only the ability to call yourself the best on the block.
Link directly to this battle: http://www.typophile.com/battle39
Link to the battle directory: http://www.typophile.com/typebattles
4 Jan 2010 — 5:36pm
Overheard on Twitter via @DanGayle: " I actually kinda like the Digg logo. Very NON-web 2.0"
Sure, but the Digg logo is more like Web 1.0, when designers were first discovering GIF optimization and pixels.
4 Jan 2010 — 5:49pm
Needs polish, but:
BTW, I don't get why we can't use existing fonts (I used Franklin); most logos start with fonts. But if "you" really like the idea I can make it from scratch.
hhp
4 Jan 2010 — 5:50pm
Please don't accept JPG files... the artifacts are horrid for typography, and the compression algorithm it offers is unnecessary for the subject matter.
4 Jan 2010 — 5:53pm
"stretch" your type muscles?
flex! :)
4 Jan 2010 — 5:55pm
Reasons to like the current logo:
What they should replace is that stupid icon of the dude with a shovel, which is barely recognizable even at large scale.
4 Jan 2010 — 6:00pm
@Jeff Peppers: edited. :)
4 Jan 2010 — 6:17pm
@Jared Benson: Thanks for updating the format requirements ;)
4 Jan 2010 — 6:38pm
Used Fontstruct to keep the squarish quality intact. This is Hexagen.
4 Jan 2010 — 7:26pm
This might as well serve as my introduction. Hi there.
4 Jan 2010 — 7:34pm
I took a stab at trying to work with what they have instead of coming up with a new solution. I don't hate what they have, but I do feel that it needs help. I also feel that it is important to see the logo in its actual size, which is small. Hope you like,
high five,
Joe
4 Jan 2010 — 7:35pm
Actually looking at my finished solution my i is to fat, FAIL. hahaha
4 Jan 2010 — 8:35pm
"Because Digg is all about sharing and discovery,
there’s a conversation that happens around the content."
hhp
4 Jan 2010 — 8:38pm
You want pixels?
Or maybe a shovel head instead of that triangle.
hhp
4 Jan 2010 — 8:57pm
ChrisL
4 Jan 2010 — 9:40pm
don't like it -- Flag it :)
4 Jan 2010 — 10:16pm
4 Jan 2010 — 11:47pm
Here is your shovel @hrant
4 Jan 2010 — 11:49pm
digg deeper
5 Jan 2010 — 3:22am
5 Jan 2010 — 3:45am
My first entry in Typophile!
5 Jan 2010 — 6:23am
Very nice, Sulekha! (...maybe not appropriate for the task, but a gorgeous composition on its own!)
5 Jan 2010 — 7:46am
5 Jan 2010 — 7:56am
Laugh out loud. Perfect.
5 Jan 2010 — 8:02am
Sulekha: Could we please have a separate thread about that luscious thing?
Darrel: Good one! The only cool thing about the Bing logo is its use of the Koch "g", which is -rightly- getting more airtime lately.
Bruno Bruno: Thanks - I can dig it. :-)
hhp
5 Jan 2010 — 8:28am
Don't have Fontlab to adjust anything, so my Illustrator rough will have to do:
5 Jan 2010 — 9:03am
I always kinda liked their logotype. Love the hipster, constructivist feel.
5 Jan 2010 — 9:42am
ChrisL
5 Jan 2010 — 9:42am
ChrisL
5 Jan 2010 — 10:59am
If only I could somehow work in a likeness of Sammy Davis, Jr.
5 Jan 2010 — 10:49am
Just a quick sketch. Trying to keep the blocky feeling of the current logo.
5 Jan 2010 — 11:35am
5 Jan 2010 — 12:14pm
So many great designs!
@Sulekha: beautiful!
@Chris, I know you've heard this before, but that gg ligature is just adorable.
@Hrant, you have some great concepts there.
Yours,
Måns
5 Jan 2010 — 12:15pm
I like where you're going with that, eliason
5 Jan 2010 — 12:40pm
If you're enjoying this topic, please digg it up!
5 Jan 2010 — 12:50pm
The icon represents a man with a shovel, huh? For some reason, I immediately thought of a man next to a letter box.
5 Jan 2010 — 1:10pm
Actually, a man with a prosthetic jackhammer.
hhp
5 Jan 2010 — 1:40pm
Man with an oversized stapler :-)
ChrisL
5 Jan 2010 — 1:40pm
Here's another effort at making the existing square design less clunky:
5 Jan 2010 — 1:40pm
Looks at the legs... them being different... is it supposed to signify something ? :-)
5 Jan 2010 — 1:50pm
like this... but more aggressive
5 Jan 2010 — 1:53pm
Nice.
Put a notch in the "d" too - at the top of the bowl-stem join.
hhp
5 Jan 2010 — 1:58pm
Wow - Nicely done, Jared!
5 Jan 2010 — 5:41pm
a bolder version of my earlier one:
5 Jan 2010 — 6:49pm
this is my entry. i may try some variations on this; but for now. this is it. done in fontstruct, or course :)
5 Jan 2010 — 6:50pm
here is a variation :)
5 Jan 2010 — 8:29pm
It's as literal as it gets:
-
BTW, Always great to see new challenges. Thanks.
…
-=®=
5 Jan 2010 — 8:35pm
@ Mans …
Somehow I see that as an animated gif logo :o)
@ JL …
hilarious.
@ dezcom
You can never go wrong with a gg lig. :o)
-=®=-
5 Jan 2010 — 9:04pm
5 Jan 2010 — 9:07pm
@ Bruno Bruno …
very clever.
So far, your first one is my favourite - But Sammy Davis Junior is right on your heals.
-=®=-
5 Jan 2010 — 9:51pm
Mark: I see what you did there, very smart! :o)