New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
Over at Brand New/Underconsideration.com, Armin Vit presents Towers Watson’s new visual identity, made by Interbrand. One of the key design elements is ‘Clarity, a proprietary handwritten font’.

”Interbrand asked Ascender to change a few things in the font, to which the licensor, FSI, had agreed. Under the usual conditions that the name would not be changed. Ascender delivered a font to Interbrand that was called MrK_TW, acknowledging Julia Sysmäläinen’s original work. Somehow (?) the name got changed to ‘Clarity, a proprietary font’. With this, Interbrand took full credit for the design work and probably charged the client for designing an exclusive typeface. As it happens, TW hasn’t even got a license for the font. […] As it stands, this is another case of a large design agency either being ignorant (which is bad), arrogant (which is normal), or stupid (which is very bad). In any case, they're stealing intellectual property, either on purpose or out of negligence. This has happened before (anybody remember where UPS got their ‘exclusive’ typeface from?) and will happen again, because while designers will complain about being ripped off themselves, they seem to be more lenient with other peoples’ property. […]”
I’m curious what action FSI will take.
28 Jan 2010 — 8:53am
We should really keep a blacklist of firms that have done this and mark up their font purchases and custom work 200%.
30 Jan 2010 — 6:18pm
Dang, FontFont seems to get this particular problem the most. Remember the new UPS logo and corporate typeface, which was a mildly modified FF Dax?
T
17 Feb 2012 — 9:47pm
So what happened?
hhp
22 Feb 2012 — 7:20am
If you click on that first Brand New ... link, you can see that it looks like Interbrand renamed the font back to "Mr K for TW"
22 Feb 2012 — 8:34am
Good, good.
hhp