I would encourage you (if you question it) to develop alternates - why not retain the current glyphs (spectacular, by the way) and develop additional characters with more information and uniformity?

Allow me to elaborate: your strokes are meticulously consistent, save for the upswing in the H, downstroke on the R and the convention on the S. However, I find all of these characteristics to be appealing.

If you question it, design a more lexically complete group without "missing" pieces where the viewer would expect them to be.

I wish you the very best with this project -

Nathan Williams
Baseline Fonts

Thanks Nathan! To develop an alternative version (with gliphs more complete and legible) is a nice solution. Thanks a lot!
Also, thanks to you, Hrant for your welcomed opinion.
Haag

Very nice Fabio. I am new to Typophile as well, and am amazed by the quality of the work (and people) that I have seen thus far. I just stumbled here by accident this morning but hope to contribute some thoughts and ideas.

The only letters that I seem to stumble across are the M, N and B. The M and N seem ordinary compared to the other letters. They don't have the same "airy" quality. Could they be broken somehow or do you think that would be awkward? The letter B seems sad to me. Could the center stroke mimic the letter E?

Anyhow, keep up the good work!

I like it a lot
The A, C, and G arent optically sloping to the right as much as the rest of the characters.
And the R looks shorter than the rest.
chris