custom typographic logo critique

Primary tabs

9 posts / 0 new
Last post
Nicholas Hood's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Jun 2010 - 4:02pm
custom typographic logo critique
0

Hi,

Im looking for some outside criticism of this logotype. Perhaps it will provide further refinement.

Thanks.

Alex Pankratov's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 - 11:50pm
0

What is it for?

Nicholas Hood's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Jun 2010 - 4:02pm
0

It was created for fun. It could be used for something in the future.

corey vickery's picture
Offline
Joined: 27 May 2009 - 3:24am
0

Like what?

Providing context about your wordmark will yield a better critique.

Tim Aarts's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2010 - 10:50am
0

I think it's a clever type concept suggesting speed or motion. It just flows.

maybe the t should be a bit shorter??

there is something about the r..

Andrew's picture
Offline
Joined: 16 Aug 2010 - 3:40am
0

Possibly work on a rule from the 'left-foot' of the k to the i? Maybe scrap the swash on the bottom left of the i.

This is purely a remark on how it could look 'kool' as I have no idea what it could be for, the genre, its characteristics, whether its selling something etc.

darrel's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Feb 2003 - 6:03pm
0

Logos 'just for fun' aren't really something that can be critiqued other than asking: did you have fun making it?

Matt Redway's picture
Offline
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 - 11:12pm
0

On first viewing I like it! Good sense of movement, but not boy-racer speed...

Unfortunately, I think it might lose some legibility at smaller sizes - the 'k' and 't' are a bit too similar. Maybe you could give 't' a medium ascender height?

Tim Aarts's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2010 - 10:50am
0

@aliminum

of course you can give feedback on a fun logo

for instance about it's aesthetics and legibility

this way he can improve his techniques