Grammar School Arithmetic (a book from 1904)

Primary tabs

23 posts / 0 new
Last post
Stickley's picture
Offline
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 - 10:08am
Grammar School Arithmetic (a book from 1904)
0

Some scans from a book I picked up recently (for 25¢). Printed in 1904.

Interesting just to see how the type is set; complex fractions (all are all nut—no virgules to be found), the @ symbol for per-item cost, page structure, impressive engravings for illustrations, and the thoughtful mix of typefaces. Quite a complex project for metal type. All for the kids.

Yes, it has all the answers in the back.

Mcs

Nick Curtis's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Apr 2005 - 8:16am
0

A rather stylish cover, too: very au courant for the Art Nouveau period. Wouldn't mind some of that 49¢-a-pound coffee...

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

I believe that nut fractions were the default for the modern style at the time, if not for all styles.
At any rate, I made nut fractions the default in Scotch Modern, which is my version of the face shown here.
However, I only did the basic fractions—half, thirds, quarters, eighths—in pre-composed form (with arbitrary fractions in slash form), as I couldn't get anything more complex to work across the board in layout apps.
If this typographic layout were to be attempted today, it would be best done in an app which handles complex maths, probably in the Computer Modern typeface.

Jörg Gustafs's picture
Offline
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 - 8:59am
0

Nice, thanks for sharing.
Gotta love that potato basket.
Poor kids, though.

John Savard's picture
Offline
Joined: 23 Nov 2009 - 8:42pm
0

From examples given in "The Manual of Linotype Typography" by Orcutt and Bartlett, p. 182-183, however, it should be noted that this sort of thing was within the capacity of a Linotype machine. I couldn't say whether that, or letterpress sterotyping, would be more likely in 1904, however.

Russell McGorman's picture
Joined: 25 May 2006 - 10:01am
0

out of curiosity, how was the long division sign set?

Stickley's picture
Offline
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 - 10:08am
0

The division sign looks to be a close parentheses with a line above it, they don't actually touch.

Stickley's picture
Offline
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 - 10:08am
0

This image is 2x3 inches, and being cut to actual size, whoever did the engravings had a very good hand (it's signed at the bottom, but I can't make it out).

Teachin' kids 'bout wheat.

Russell McGorman's picture
Joined: 25 May 2006 - 10:01am
0

@ Stickley ,

Thanks.

Kent Lew's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 - 11:00am
0

Engraving like this was pretty standard fare for the period. There were legions of engravers. It was an industrial profession — shop rooms full of people making all those engravings for catalogs and advertisements, etc.

Adam Chronister's picture
Offline
Joined: 16 Dec 2010 - 11:51am
0

The style used for this book is beautiful. It make be harder to read for a student due to the spacing, but it's certainly less dull than the textbooks that I used in school.

John Savard's picture
Offline
Joined: 23 Nov 2009 - 8:42pm
0

Incidentally, I did a search for this book, and found that while this particular book is not on Google Books or the Internet Archive, several other books by this author are. Instead of being a teacher, he was a mathematician; he had written several books about the history of mathematics, as well as other textbooks for more advanced grades.

In fact, he was the compiler of one book that was still being reprinted into the 1960s: A Source Book of Mathematics.

Emmy Ezzell's picture
Offline
Joined: 17 Dec 2010 - 9:12am
0

A title character in Peter Carey's novel "Parrot and Olivier in America" is one of those legions of engravers, drafted into his profession by a forgery ring. Pretty interesting descriptions of that venerable trade.

Maxim Zhukov's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 May 2005 - 11:18am
0

This looks, and reads, great. The craftmanship is amazing. I especially appreciate the use of smaller-size figures for numbering of the exercises. Very sensitive…

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

The Clarendon is the correct bold for the Scotch Modern.
I regret making the bold of my Scotch Modern high contrast (assuming that was people's expectation).
I should have made it a Clarendon, kind of like a Linotype duplex combo.

Jörg Gustafs's picture
Offline
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 - 8:59am
0

How about an alternate Bold then? Never too late, is it?

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

It is too late, I'm afraid. I don't have the stomach for another revival—the Modern Suite was a new idea for me at the time, and a huge undertaking, now I have some fresh ideas I need to explore. Maybe some other typeface will now get two bolds.

John Nolan's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Dec 2002 - 11:00am
0

Umm... what about some kind of mash-up of a Bodoni and, oh, I don't know, an Egyptian?

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

There are two bolds in the new Pratt fonts of the Globe and Mail 2010 Adrian Norris redesign: both a traditional high contrast version and, au courant, a slab style.

Justin Chodzko's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Apr 2008 - 7:32am
0

Engraving like this was pretty standard fare for the period. There were legions of engravers. It was an industrial profession — shop rooms full of people making all those engravings for catalogs and advertisements, etc.

Would they still be engraving into metal, or by this time would a lot be done on scratchboard/scraperboard for photographic reproduction?

Beau W's picture
Offline
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 - 9:57pm
0

Usually end-grain wood engraving. Wood engraving was most popular for several reasons- one reason being that the wood engraving could be set with the type. (Which would then be used to make the plates for mass printing.) Metal engravings are printed on a completely different kind of press- meaning: on separate pages, often on a different kind of paper.

oprion's picture
Offline
Joined: 15 Nov 2007 - 12:15pm
0

Wood engravings were usually turned into electrotypes so as not to smash the originals in lengthy print runs.

Nick Curtis's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Apr 2005 - 8:16am
0

Would they still be engraving into metal, or by this time would a lot be done on scratchboard/scraperboard for photographic reproduction?

The halftone process was more or less perfected by 1872, so one may presume that straight litho negs (black-and-clear only) were also used on or after that date.