Another "what's this design element called..."

Primary tabs

16 posts / 0 new
Last post
Dave Williams's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Jul 2005 - 7:21am
Another "what's this design element called..."
0

Someone was asking recently about designs/logos made of stripes where the design was picked out by changes in the stripe thickness. I have in mind a similar, but different effect:

I've seen designs where the image appears, at first glance (especially when you look at it quite close up) to be just lines, usually diagonal. But then, if you look at it from a little further away, or move your head and the page relative to each other, you see text or a graphic element, subtly hidden. It's not a change in the direction of the lines, nor an immediately noticeable change in the line thickness (unline the previous person's question).

(a) do you know what I'm talking about?
(b) if so, has this thing got a name?
(c) how's it done?

Cheers

Jean Paul Beumer's picture
Joined: 4 Oct 2007 - 9:56am
0

.

Wouter Ramaker's picture
Offline
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 - 9:40am
0

I think you are refering to this;

I'm not sure if there is a proper name for it other than 'optical trickery'

it is done by slightly altering the thickness or size of the elements (lines/dots).

Dave Williams's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Jul 2005 - 7:21am
0

That's the one, Wouter. (Especially the top one.)
So it is just line thickness, then: merely more subtle than in the other guy's query!

I bet somebody somewhere's given it a name though!

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

Wow that's very cool.
I see the words so much better with my "bad" eye, or when I take off my glasses, which correct my stigmatism, or when I move the image with the scroll bar.

James Michaels's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Mar 2010 - 12:54am
0

> I see the words so much better with my
> "bad" eye, or when I take off my glasses

Me too. I'm not sure why.

Jean Paul Beumer's picture
Joined: 4 Oct 2007 - 9:56am
0

Words? What words? ;-)

Riccardo Sartori's picture
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 - 4:20am
0
Dave Williams's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Jul 2005 - 7:21am
0

Yeah, that's the "other" recent thread I was referring to. Of course, in those, there's no optical "trickery" since the line width changes are strong enough to be obvious without having to take your specs off or wiggle your head about! :^)

Reynir Heiðberg Stefánsson's picture
Joined: 19 Nov 2010 - 11:15am
0

I think the official name is 'Zat headbonesplittenen badwordcursenen paininzeeyes'.

Dave Williams's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Jul 2005 - 7:21am
0

LOL ... :^)

Seriously though: I've now got the answer: some of your replies suddenly reminded me of the 'spatial frequency' effect, as described in a Scientific American article (here).

Doing a Google image search on "spatial frequency" brought up http://results including those very same images that Wouter linked to above: thus.

I just never made the link between these two types of images...

Jeffrey's picture
Offline
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 - 3:25am
0

OpArt?

Dave Williams's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Jul 2005 - 7:21am
0

Well, quite: it's easy to imagine that Bridget Riley would have had a field day playing with this!

Claire Bibio's picture
Offline
Joined: 30 May 2010 - 10:36am
0

Ouch my eyes.

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

Those Soulwax images need a bit more letterspacing :-)

I wonder what the implications of this optical illusion are for reading theory.

Jeffrey's picture
Offline
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 - 3:25am
0

I wonder what the implications of this optical illusion are for reading theory.

Try looking at these images intensly for a couple of minutes and then try to read a page of text and you will know ;-)