Gelato Script by Schizotype released

Primary tabs

13 posts / 0 new
Last post
Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
Gelato Script by Schizotype released
0

Schizotype Font Foundry is proud to announce the release of Gelato Script, a smooth flowing baseball script with loads of OpenType features and good language coverage.

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

Dave, that S looks like L.

Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
0

Nick, I'm going to respectfully disagree with you on that. It's the swash S anyway, so in the very rare situation where the context isn't enough to differentiate, there are three other S glyphs to choose from.

Dina Lydia's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 - 9:31pm
0

I love the font, but I have to agree with Nick: only the first of the four S glyphs looks like an S (not an L) and even the first one is confusing. It could be a T.

Reynir Heiðberg Stefánsson's picture
Joined: 19 Nov 2010 - 11:15am
0

They do, however, resemble the S that I was taught to write in school.

Tim Aarts's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2011 - 4:57pm
0

I have to agree it looks like an L.

1. S
2. Got me thinking
3. L
4. L

Sc makes it easier to read then Sa thats for shore.

Maybe you could tweak the angle a bit? (or is that a noob suggestion?)

But I really like your font. And baseball scripts are trending. Yours wil definitely sell! :-)

Tim Aarts's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2011 - 4:57pm
0

Shore sure whats the difference. :P

Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
0

Oops, might have caused a bit of confusion here. The third and fourth in the image are Ls. I was trying to show a word that could be confused - Sassy with Lassy.

Tim Aarts's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2011 - 4:57pm
0

Aaah ok. 2 is still a bit confusing. But hey, there is another s to choose from that works great!

Again lovely font!

André Simard's picture
Offline
Joined: 25 Nov 2004 - 12:11pm
0

The alternate S is still confusing to my point of view. I think the confusion come from the spin which should be less right. Also, did you try a smaller top loop? Your basic S is more readable even though it may be less right. Good work overall.

Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
0

Hi. I didn't try a smaller loop on top, because it never occurred to me that the S was ambiguous. I thought I, T, J, L and Z would be more likely candidates for problem readings, but I think context solves most problems (as it does in most scrip fonts, where if you look at certain uppercase characters individually you go "what's that then?")
I'm considering making a Pro version, with way more swashes and alternates, all selectable by the user rather than automatic contextual substitutions. I'de probably also add alternates for all caps settings for acronyms. As of now, it's selling much better than I expected, so I wouldn't want to quickly release an advanced version, for fear it would appear as something of a cash in. I'm going to wait and see how it gets used, and if I feel a Pro version would be a useful addition, I'll make one. I guess the decider will be when I see someone's modified it themselves to solve a certain problem and I think it looks bad! I am forced to use Monotype Corsiva quite regularly in the day job, and the amount of times I'm asked to change the ampersand for something that 'looks less like a J' is pretty ridiculous. I'm all for users using fonts as they see fit, but if a line is crossed I'll find it hard to not march right in and tell them they're doing it wrong!

Jan Willem Wennekes's picture
Joined: 11 Aug 2011 - 8:55am
0

Hey congrats on being this month's Rising Star at MyFonts!

Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
0

Thank you very much!