ij digraph under consideration

Primary tabs

21 posts / 0 new
Last post
Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
ij digraph under consideration
0

Working on Vulpa italic. The ij glyph seems to 'want' to join. Good idea/bad idea?
And on the subject of ij - do any of you put a sub i j by ij in the locl feature for Dutch, or is the character generally substituted automatically by Dutch computers (or, where their keyboards have ij key - does this key produce the correct unicode glyph or just i and j)?

Amado Ohland's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Apr 2011 - 8:09am
0

I see what you see there, but the joined ij looks like a strangely-styled y with a diaeresis or umlaut over it. If you want it to be clear that this is /ij/ and not that other thing, I'd avoid.

Riccardo Sartori's picture
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 - 4:20am
0

http://typophile.com/node/58827
http://typophile.com/node/67294

Unfortunately at the moment images don’t show up in the linked threads.

Riccardo Sartori's picture
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 - 4:20am
0

the joined ij looks like a strangely-styled y with a diaeresis or umlaut over it

Which is the historical style: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e2/Leesplankje_van_Hoogeveen_...

Bert Vanderveen's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jun 2004 - 8:19am
0

The common form for /ij/ is more like a /u/ with a descending + curling right side…

Briän M Zick's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Nov 2008 - 9:38pm
0

I say go for it. :)

(That's coming from a non-Dutch reader.)

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

{To Follow}

Luma Vine's picture
Offline
Joined: 1 Jun 2010 - 1:16pm
0

It seems like if you made that join, you would want to also join the ti in the same way. Pretty soon you are going to be doing a full connected script! (do it!)

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

It’s an affectation that will puzzle the Dutch reader.

Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
0

I figure if the standard formatting is i then j then the unconnected option is always available to them, but in a more display setting the user could choose to use the connected version if they so wished. I can't see it puzzling the Dutch reader any more than an st ligature puzzles an English reader. I just like the look of the connected version.

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

Nick, there are some super-funky "ij"s in the
Netherlands, so I doubt this one will faze them.

hhp

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

I can't see it puzzling the Dutch reader any more than an st ligature puzzles an English reader.

The Quaint ligatures st and ct do puzzle English readers, not in the sense of perplexing as to what characters they represent, but as to why such an affectation should have been used to frequently interrupt text.

…there are some super-funky "ij"s in the Netherlands,

But surely they are in type and lettering (especially scripts) that has a general funkiness, which this style doesn’t appear to.

It’s my opinion that for this particular typeface, an ij ligature would seem unwarranted and out of place to a Dutch reader.
But if the face also has some other quaints and oddities, maybe it would fit in.

At any rate, it could be a discretionary ligature, but if you make it default it would be sure to annoy typographers (and their clients) who might like the face but don’t think quaints are quite right for the job in hand.

Bert Vanderveen's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jun 2004 - 8:19am
0

Even in connecting script styles the upward stroke between /i/ and /j/ will look more like the /u/ form than the example shown. It is just too weird.

Rob Mientjes's picture
Offline
Joined: 5 Jan 2006 - 9:33am
0

It is too weird. Quirky, cute, but not an ij. Like Bart says, the ij is a running-script thing too, and is basically a /u/-shaped /y/ with two dots.

Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
0

Ok, I'm keeping it as an alternate. Because I like it. Is dlig best feature for this sort of thing?

Craig Eliason's picture
Offline
Joined: 19 Mar 2004 - 1:44pm
0

Will there be other discretionary ligatures, and if so, do you anticipate that a user wanting those will want this one? If the answers are yes and maybe not, it might be better simply as a stylistic set.

Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
0

That's kind of what I thought. There's Th and ry discretionary ligatures, and I might make some st sp ch ct ligatures too if I can make them not look stupid! I suppose a stylistic set is the way to go.

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

> It is [just] too weird.

This is where nativity kicks in, to correct assumers like me...
To rephrase something I've often said: without nativity, trying
to innovate is like Russian roulette.

hhp

Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
0

I might make some st sp ch ct ligatures too if I can make them not look stupid!

http://typophile.com/files/dlig.JPG

The connected ij will be in a stylistic set. These are the dligs, for people who like that sort of thing...

Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
0

Cannot get this img tag to work. Image is in first post.

Dave Rowland Schizotype Fonts's picture
Joined: 19 May 2009 - 6:33pm
0

Done it.
The sooner attach image is back up and running, the better!