New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
I just got an iMac and wondered, why all the Indian-name typefaces? I assume they include Indian character glyphs, but why so many? Why are they seemingly the same? For example, the following look (nearly) identical (and these probably aren't even comprehensive because I stopped at "M"):
Set 1:
Malayalam
Bangla
Lao
Gurmukhi
Kannada
Myanmar
Set 2:
Bangala Sangram
Devanagari MT
Gjuarati Sangram
Inai Mathi
Lao Sangram
Myanmar Sangram
Malayalam Sangram
Just curious.
28 May 2012 — 4:35pm
When you say 'they look the same', are you looking at the Indian characters, or at Latin characters that show up in the font preview or font menu listings? The latter might be substituted from other fonts.
28 May 2012 — 6:32pm
If I list only the *Sangam* fonts I have on OS X 10.7, I get
The last three correspond to Southeast Asian Scripts, the first group to South Asian Scripts, as you can see on the Unicode Character Code Charts.
Bangla corresponds to Bengali. Inai Mathi is Tamil if I rely on the unicode range it covers.
29 May 2012 — 4:44am
John, I am only looking at the Font Preview. But unless you need Indian characters, there's really no reason to keep these activated (or keep them in general), correct?
29 May 2012 — 9:58am
In case you are interested in seeing how different these various Indic scripts actually are, have a look at this page (before you deactivate the fonts):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmic_scripts#Comparison