New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
Sans, black, combination of different styles, must find!
Posted by sdaris in
2 Jun 2012 — 3:44am
2 Jun 2012 — 3:44am
Does anybody know what this typeface is? Here's the website where it is used:
http://www.atipo.es/
Beautiful, balanced, a nice combination of different styles. Thanks :D
User login
Support our Sponsors
2 Jun 2012 — 6:30am
They’re a type foundry too. Probably it’s one of their own. You should ask them directly.
If you use the Edit link to move the post up to the main Type ID Board, maybe someone could be able to inspect the flash file in order to get a name.
2 Jun 2012 — 7:17am
Not surprisingly, the font name is Atipo Sans.
2 Jun 2012 — 12:08pm
I know they are a design studio but I couldn't find this font on their site, which led me to believe that they used another foundry's typeface for their main identity. I actually still can't find this font so I wonder if they sell it at all. Thanks anyway.
2 Jun 2012 — 1:52pm
Their opening page is a flash file. It is possible to interpret a flash file (.swf) to determine its components. In this case, it includes the font, embedded.
The rest of the site seems to indicate that they use this font and a lighter version for all of their client design work. Doesn't make sense to me, but that's how I read it!
Do move this to the Type ID Board as suggested by Riccardo. You originally posted in the 'solved ID' section. Not your fault, the site layout is very confusing! But only you can move the thread to where it belongs, because you originated it.
- Herb
2 Jun 2012 — 8:09pm
From http://tundrablog.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture-52.png, one can conclude that Atipo sans exists (at least) in light, regular and bold
If you download http://issuu.com/corondel/docs/elcorondel_52#download (in Spanish) and have a look you will find in an article concerning their font Calendas (on page 22) the following sentence:
It thus seems rather clear that Atipo sans is for their own use only.
19 Jun 2012 — 11:49pm
Thanks, all. Instead of moving this to the correct Type ID section, I'll just consider it solved.