It looks very Doyald Young, except there are some weaknesses (like the color difference between the two words). And it's most probably handmade (not a font).
On the other hand, now that you mention the "n"s, notice that the second "n" is malformed, while the first one (and every other glyph) is fine... So now I think maybe it is a font, and only that terminal "n" is a custom (and bad) mod job.
And I'm also getting a bell ringing: That "G" especially reminds me a lot of Michael Harvey's recent Tisdall font (of which I don't have a sample handy).
I'm interested to see the answer for this one, but I can see it isn't Michael Harvey's "Tisdall Script" (see http://www.identifont.com/show?BZ for a sample showing).
It doesn't look like anything in my Script Guide either, which is why I'd like to know what it is.
This looks to me like it actually might be a font, not calligraphy. If it is handmade, then it was done digitally, not as actual hand-done lettering. I say this based on the consistency of the arches of u and y, the bowls of a and d, and the two r's. The difference in color between the two words is the result of enlarging a single master.
19.Aug.2003 12.17pm
It looks very Doyald Young, except there are some weaknesses (like the color difference between the two words). And it's most probably handmade (not a font).
hhp
19.Aug.2003 12.37pm
On the other hand, now that you mention the "n"s, notice that the second "n" is malformed, while the first one (and every other glyph) is fine... So now I think maybe it is a font, and only that terminal "n" is a custom (and bad) mod job.
And I'm also getting a bell ringing: That "G" especially reminds me a lot of Michael Harvey's recent Tisdall font (of which I don't have a sample handy).
hhp
19.Aug.2003 2.23pm
I'm interested to see the answer for this one, but I can see it isn't Michael Harvey's "Tisdall Script" (see http://www.identifont.com/show?BZ for a sample showing).
It doesn't look like anything in my Script Guide either, which is why I'd like to know what it is.
19.Aug.2003 2.37pm
Oh, Tisdall was way off.
(Yves, how do you do a <blush> again?)
hhp
19.Aug.2003 3.43pm
here's a secret link
www.13pt.com/projects/type/victoria.html
but...it's not the same
20.Aug.2003 5.32am
This looks to me like it actually might be a font, not
calligraphy. If it is handmade, then it was done digitally,
not as actual hand-done lettering. I say this based on
the consistency of the arches of u and y, the bowls of a
and d, and the two r's. The difference in color between
the two words is the result of enlarging a single master.
20.Aug.2003 6.34am
De gregorio 1- all typophile 0

lets play the second time
20.Aug.2003 7.29am
glade fragant myst
20.Aug.2003 10.51am
the only Alpine Spice that i know --- red wine
David Hamuel
21.Aug.2003 6.11am
ajaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!
nobody know!!!!!!
well....
i'll never know
21.Aug.2003 7.44am
weird post...
21.Aug.2003 8.35am
Let's just pretend it's an in-house script based on some calligraphy someone did for them once. Seems like a plausable explanation to me.
21.Aug.2003 9.25am
its the second time i see this font.
the first time i see her, i was riding in bike on a rural city.
i never forger a face.
and this is a font, is not a simple calligraphy.
no one will win.
19.Aug.2003 12.21pm
Both 'n's are different. Probably calligraphy, like
the man said.
19.Aug.2003 3.32pm
Juan Pablo, where did you get this sample from?
20.Aug.2003 7.10am
Glade Air Fresheners?
20.Aug.2003 1.16pm
> (Yves, how do you do a <blush> again?)
Elementary, my dear Watson. 
\clipart{blush}
It ain't rocket science!