New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
Stanford says "jt cannot be accurately reproduced with any typeface and should not be modified in any way"
Posted by riverguardian in
10 Nov 2012 — 11:08pm
10 Nov 2012 — 11:08pm
That may be true, but it doesn't stop us typophiles from trying, hm? The best I could get was Stempel Schneidler LT. Any thoughts on alternatives or possible influences in the typeface?
![Syndicate content](/misc/feed.png "Comments for \"Stanford says "jt cannot be accurately reproduced with any typeface and should not be modified in any way"\""){kind=small}
User login
Support our Sponsors
10 Nov 2012 — 11:25pm
It looks like it could be a variation on Capitolium 2 Pro Bold
11 Nov 2012 — 1:56am
Why would you want to reproduce the logo “outside of official channels” anyway?
11 Nov 2012 — 9:57am
Just for curiosity's sake!
11 Nov 2012 — 4:29pm
Nick, one "good" reason is to give an unofficial entity the appearance of officialness.
BTW:
- What does "jt" mean?
- Who did this logo for them?
- What actual font(s) are they using, like for text?
hhp