For the umpteenth time: Stylistic Set descriptive names

yanone's picture

No idea where we stand in the implementation of descriptive names for Stylistic Sets in applications.
But here's a question anyway:

As far as I know there are no specs on where in the naming tables to put them. Any name table ID can be chosen.
Here I also see a major reason why no one bothers to implement them because they don't know where to look.

Are there any conventions yet on ID ranges?

k.l.'s picture

No conventions are needed because a Feature Table can point, via its FeatureParams field, at a specific name ID. See the feature tag registry which also mentions which name IDs may be used.

yanone's picture

Okay, so given an FDK code snippet like below, will the FeatureParams field that you mentioned automatically point to the right name ID, given that in this code I don’t even point out name IDs?
In other words: Is this all code that is necessary?


feature ss04 {
# Stylistic Set 4
featureNames {
name 1 "Alternate german lowercase sz";
name 3 "Alternate german lowercase sz";
};
}ss04;

k.l.'s picture

It is as simple as that.

malcolm's picture

Does anyone have any info on what applications display these name records in the UI?

Thomas Phinney's picture

I don't know of any that do, yet. Certainly not InDesign or the like. Anybody else know of one that does?

JanekZ's picture

Maybe in the [near] future; there is one Adobe font with human readable names: Source Sans Pro

Thomas Phinney's picture

I would not assume any correlation between the data being in Adobe fonts and support in Adobe applications. Adobe has had optical size data in OpenType fonts for over a decade now, and it is still unsupported by any Adobe application.

Syndicate content Syndicate content