Welcome to Typophile
Please Sign in.

Comments

Primary tabs

Displaying 1 - 17 of 17 comments.
70s glamour
Commented on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 - 1:18pm

thanks for your suggestions guys.

70s glamour
Commented on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 - 2:14pm

I'd suggest posting that question in a new thread, and you'll no doubt get lots of answers.

70s glamour
Commented on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 - 12:47pm

I've never seen that variation on Helvetica before. I hate it. :P

quintessential UK 1920s-80s typeface suggestions?
Commented on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 - 2:55pm

lovely suggestions, thank you.

is it silly that I don't like using Gill Sans because I don't like what he was like as a person?

The difference between a font and a typeface. Is there one?
Commented on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 - 11:22am

so how do we know that you are correct, phrostbyte, and not anthony jones, who says the complete opposite?

The difference between a font and a typeface. Is there one?
Commented on Friday, 20 March 2009 - 10:09am

nachos, i was just interested in the opinion of the experts. :D

i sure do like stimulating debate.

The difference between a font and a typeface. Is there one?
Commented on Monday, 23 March 2009 - 4:29am

thanks for your contribution, newguy.

The difference between a font and a typeface. Is there one?
Commented on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 - 8:55am

i don't agree. the word 'fount' has been used for a very long time when referring to typesetting.

The difference between a font and a typeface. Is there one?
Commented on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 - 9:19am

*rubs head confusedly* i reckon the terms have become interchangeable today.

The difference between a font and a typeface. Is there one?
Commented on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 - 6:08am

gah, the anthony jones blog contradicts what other people are saying e.g. nachos' post.

The difference between a font and a typeface. Is there one?
Commented on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 - 11:16am

wow, so we're saying every instance of a typeface is an individual font? helvetica bold 10pt, helvetica bold 11pt, helvetica bold 12pt etc?

Those bags in the Helvetica documentary
Commented on Friday, 10 October 2008 - 2:32pm

thanks! :D

Typeface family which decays?
Commented on Monday, 3 March 2008 - 9:56am

thank you :)

sans serif becomes serif?
Commented on Thursday, 13 December 2007 - 4:09am

you're all geniuses.

why is rotis ugly? i saw another forum elsewhere where type designers were hotly debating how vile it was too.

sans serif becomes serif?
Commented on Thursday, 13 December 2007 - 2:11pm

what an informed response, thank you florian. that Florendo quote was precisely the one i was reading...

i wonder why others on typophile find it to be ugly to look at though?

san serif flourish
Commented on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 - 8:57am

i do apologise - flourish may not be the correct terminology. i'm talking more about symbols i think (take a look at the link i posted?).

one typeface, different looks
Commented on Monday, 10 December 2007 - 10:15am

i'd say i need about 15 degrees of progression. re the history of type idea: that's something i've already considered, and although it's a lovely concept, many of the faces are pretty timeless in appearance, plus their date of birth won't mean much to...